ISBN: 1230037446

[EAN: 9781230037448], Neubuch, [PU: RareBooksClub], SUBJECTS, This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 208 pages. Dimensions: 9.7in. x 7.4in. x 0.4in.This historic book may have numerou… Mehr…

[EAN: 9781230037448], Neubuch, [PU: RareBooksClub], SUBJECTS, This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 208 pages. Dimensions: 9.7in. x 7.4in. x 0.4in.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1896 edition. Excerpt: . . . tried speedily by a Judge without a jury. Charles Wilson, Q. C. , for the prisoner. A. N. Richards, Q. C. , for the Crown: The prisoner has no status to make this motion. The gaoler has no right to bring him here for this purpose. His warrant is to keep him in custody in the Provincial Gaol till the Assizes and then deliver him for trial. Code Sec. 769, Sub-sec. 2 having provided for re-election in certain specific cases, of which this is not one, excludes the idea of a right to re-elect by any inference. If there is the right to disavow the first election why not a second, and so on. It cannot be said that such a course is to be in the discretion of the Judge. We do not desire to press the prisoner in any way, but question the legality of the proposition. GREASE, J. : I have considered the arguments and cases adduced before me by Mr. Richards, Q. C. , and Mr. Wilson, Q. C. , and the objects and provisions of the Speedy Trials Act, especially those relating to the power of the prisoner to elect and re-elect. While I feel myself constrained to accede to Mr. Richards construction of section 769, that the re-election there relates only to the trials of summary cases and juvenile offenders before the ordinary magistrate, I have on the other hand satisfied myself that the practice of re-election by those accused of offences of the higher class--as already practiced in several cases which have come before this Court, and several Judges thereof--is a correct one, and well within the scope and necessary intendment of the Speedy Trials Act. The ratio earistendi, the very life of the Act, is speedy trial. One object of it is to put an end, at the express wish of the prisoner, the person most affected by it, to the pain of prolonged suspense in. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN.<

2013, ISBN: 1230037446

[EAN: 9781230037448], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing… Mehr…

[EAN: 9781230037448], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1896 edition. Excerpt: . tried speedily by a Judge without a jury. Charles Wilson, Q.C., for the prisoner. A. N. Richards, Q.C., for the Crown: The prisoner has no status to make this motion. The gaoler has no right to bring him here for this purpose. His warrant is to keep him in custody in the Provincial Gaol till the Assizes and then deliver him for trial. Code Sec. 769, Sub-sec. 2 having provided for re-election in certain specific cases, of which this is not one, excludes the idea of a right to re-elect by any inference. If there is the right to disavow the first election why not a second, and so on. It cannot be said that such a course is to be in the discretion of the Judge. We do not desire to press the prisoner in any way, but question the legality of the proposition. GREASE, J.: I have considered the arguments and cases adduced before me by Mr. Richards, Q.C., and Mr. Wilson, Q.C., and the objects and provisions of the Speedy Trials Act, especially those relating to the power of the prisoner to elect and re-elect. While I feel myself constrained to accede to Mr. Richards construction of section 769, that the re-election there relates only to the trials of summary cases and juvenile offenders before the ordinary magistrate, I have on the other hand satisfied myself that the practice of re-election by those accused of offences of the higher class--as already practiced in several cases which have come before this Court, and several Judges thereof--is a correct one, and well within the scope and necessary intendment of the Speedy Trials Act. The ratio earistendi, the very life of the Act, is speedy trial. One object of it is to put an end, at the express wish of the prisoner, the person most affected by it, to the pain of prolonged suspense in.<

2013, ISBN: 1230037446

[EAN: 9781230037448], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing … Mehr…

[EAN: 9781230037448], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1896 edition. Excerpt: . tried speedily by a Judge without a jury. Charles Wilson, Q.C., for the prisoner. A. N. Richards, Q.C., for the Crown: The prisoner has no status to make this motion. The gaoler has no right to bring him here for this purpose. His warrant is to keep him in custody in the Provincial Gaol till the Assizes and then deliver him for trial. Code Sec. 769, Sub-sec. 2 having provided for re-election in certain specific cases, of which this is not one, excludes the idea of a right to re-elect by any inference. If there is the right to disavow the first election why not a second, and so on. It cannot be said that such a course is to be in the discretion of the Judge. We do not desire to press the prisoner in any way, but question the legality of the proposition. GREASE, J.: I have considered the arguments and cases adduced before me by Mr. Richards, Q.C., and Mr. Wilson, Q.C., and the objects and provisions of the Speedy Trials Act, especially those relating to the power of the prisoner to elect and re-elect. While I feel myself constrained to accede to Mr. Richards construction of section 769, that the re-election there relates only to the trials of summary cases and juvenile offenders before the ordinary magistrate, I have on the other hand satisfied myself that the practice of re-election by those accused of offences of the higher class--as already practiced in several cases which have come before this Court, and several Judges thereof--is a correct one, and well within the scope and necessary intendment of the Speedy Trials Act. The ratio earistendi, the very life of the Act, is speedy trial. One object of it is to put an end, at the express wish of the prisoner, the person most affected by it, to the pain of prolonged suspense in.<