1848, ISBN: a262cfd8da3bc4486738a3e900c324e1

Gebundene Ausgabe

[SC: 47.48], CAREY, Henry. The Past, The Present, and The Future. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1848. Octavo, original blind-stamped green cloth. $1500.First English editio… Mehr…

[SC: 47.48], CAREY, Henry. The Past, The Present, and The Future. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1848. Octavo, original blind-stamped green cloth. $1500.First English edition of this important economic treatise by "the American apostle of optimism" (Roll, 275).Although Carey began his career in political economy as a die-hard supporter of the free market, in 1844, "he renounced his belief in laissez-faire for good in his book Past, Present and Future (1848) despite the fact that during this era the idea of free trade was gathering considerable momentum worldwide" (ANB). A founder of the so-called "nationalist school," Carey's ideology came to resemble the Utopian European social reform school so popular in the Scandinavian countries and Western Europe. "In his Past, Present, and Future, Carey announced a law of production from land the exact reverse of Ricardo's. With a great wealth of illustration, he laid down the principle that, in the progress of society, men first till the easily worked and poorer soils, and descend upon the richer lands as capital and numbers increase, so that with the advance of the community the rate of return from the land rises instead of falling" (Palgrave I:226). The work was so controversial that John Stuart Mill wrote Principles of Political Economy to refute it. With publisher's catalogue. The first American edition was published the same year. Early owner inscription. Bookseller's ticket. Binder's ticket.Slight dampstaining to endpapers, a few finger smudges to text, faint spotting to rear board, and toning and a bit of wear to extremities of original cloth. An extremely good copy.<

1848, ISBN: a262cfd8da3bc4486738a3e900c324e1

Gebundene Ausgabe

[SC: 24.58], [PU: Philadelphia, Carey & Hart, 1848.], NOISBN, 8vo, pp. 474; a few smudges or stains, but a good copy in the original brown cloth, spine sunned and slightly cockled, front … Mehr…

[SC: 24.58], [PU: Philadelphia, Carey & Hart, 1848.], NOISBN, 8vo, pp. 474; a few smudges or stains, but a good copy in the original brown cloth, spine sunned and slightly cockled, front hinge cracked but holding.First edition. Carey vigorously appeals for tariff protection and attacks the Ricardian theory of rent. He argues that 'the historical sequence of cultivation at least in the United States was the exact reverse of the one proposed by Ricardo, namely, from inferior to superior land, apparently because returns from the application of capital to land yield increasing rather than diminishing returns' (Blaug). The similarity of ideas between Bastiat and Carey is well documented, particularly the close parallelism in their theories of the origin of land value. However, Haney observes that 'Carey impresses the reader as decidedly the more original, and on the whole his work antedated Bastiat's' (p. 338). His ideas caused much controversy and were refuted by Mill in his Principles of Political Economy (1848). Einaudi 886; Goldsmiths' 35490; Kress C.7314; see Blaug, Great Economists before Keynes, pp. 39-40, and Haney, History of Economic thought, pp. 337-338.<

1848, ISBN: a262cfd8da3bc4486738a3e900c324e1

Gebundene Ausgabe

[SC: 24.55], [PU: Philadelphia, Carey & Hart, 1848.], NOISBN, 8vo, pp. 474; a few smudges or stains, but a good copy in the original brown cloth, spine sunned and slightly cockled, front … Mehr…

[SC: 24.55], [PU: Philadelphia, Carey & Hart, 1848.], NOISBN, 8vo, pp. 474; a few smudges or stains, but a good copy in the original brown cloth, spine sunned and slightly cockled, front hinge cracked but holding.First edition. Carey vigorously appeals for tariff protection and attacks the Ricardian theory of rent. He argues that 'the historical sequence of cultivation at least in the United States was the exact reverse of the one proposed by Ricardo, namely, from inferior to superior land, apparently because returns from the application of capital to land yield increasing rather than diminishing returns' (Blaug). The similarity of ideas between Bastiat and Carey is well documented, particularly the close parallelism in their theories of the origin of land value. However, Haney observes that 'Carey impresses the reader as decidedly the more original, and on the whole his work antedated Bastiat's' (p. 338). His ideas caused much controversy and were refuted by Mill in his Principles of Political Economy (1848). Einaudi 886; Goldsmiths' 35490; Kress C.7314; see Blaug, Great Economists before Keynes, pp. 39-40, and Haney, History of Economic thought, pp. 337-338.<

1848, ISBN: a262cfd8da3bc4486738a3e900c324e1

Gebundene Ausgabe

[SC: 24.3], [PU: Philadelphia, Carey & Hart, 1848.], NOISBN, 8vo, pp. 474; a few smudges or stains, but a good copy in the original brown cloth, spine sunned and slightly cockled, front h… Mehr…

[SC: 24.3], [PU: Philadelphia, Carey & Hart, 1848.], NOISBN, 8vo, pp. 474; a few smudges or stains, but a good copy in the original brown cloth, spine sunned and slightly cockled, front hinge cracked but holding.First edition. Carey vigorously appeals for tariff protection and attacks the Ricardian theory of rent. He argues that 'the historical sequence of cultivation at least in the United States was the exact reverse of the one proposed by Ricardo, namely, from inferior to superior land, apparently because returns from the application of capital to land yield increasing rather than diminishing returns' (Blaug). The similarity of ideas between Bastiat and Carey is well documented, particularly the close parallelism in their theories of the origin of land value. However, Haney observes that 'Carey impresses the reader as decidedly the more original, and on the whole his work antedated Bastiat's' (p. 338). His ideas caused much controversy and were refuted by Mill in his Principles of Political Economy (1848). Einaudi 886; Goldsmiths' 35490; Kress C.7314; see Blaug, Great Economists before Keynes, pp. 39-40, and Haney, History of Economic thought, pp. 337-338.<