. .
Deutsch
Deutschland
Ähnliche Bücher
Weitere, andere Bücher, die diesem Buch sehr ähnlich sein könnten:
Suchtools
Anmelden

Anmelden mit Facebook:

Registrieren
Passwort vergessen?


Such-Historie
Merkliste
Links zu eurobuch.com

Dieses Buch teilen auf…
..?
Buchtipps
Aktuelles
Tipp von eurobuch.com
FILTER
- 0 Ergebnisse
Kleinster Preis: 14.99 EUR, größter Preis: 14.99 EUR, Mittelwert: 14.99 EUR
The Middle East Conflict in The Guardian and The New York Times - Patrizia Demleitner
Vergriffenes Buch, derzeit bei uns nicht verfügbar.
(*)
Patrizia Demleitner:

The Middle East Conflict in The Guardian and The New York Times - Taschenbuch

2007, ISBN: 3638666069

ID: 9721002196

[EAN: 9783638666060], Neubuch, [PU: Grin Verlag Jul 2007], This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. - Seminar paper from the year 2002 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, printed single-sided, grade: 1.7, University of Regensburg (Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik), course: Hauptseminar The Language of News Reporting, 19 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Mark Twain once said, If you don t read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed . Indeed, it s true that most newspapers tend to be biased and to represent a certain ideology. Nearly imperceptible, the newsmaker leaves marks or hints of his attitude and ideology in his work and thus very often looses the independence and objectivity that news reporting ought to have. Evidence can be found for example in the choice of vocabulary, the sentence structure or the narrative structure of an article. This analysis wants to examine and compare two leading newspapers, the Guardian and the New York Times, with regard to bias in the way they are treating the Middle-East conflict. For a long time, the violence in the Middle East and the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians have been a common topic in the news and therefore it is important to know how far the reader can rely on an objective point of view when events are reported. Not a day goes by without a headline dealing with peacemaking efforts or a new attack of a suicide bomber or another advance of the Israeli army on Palestinian ground. I want to verify the hypotheses that the Guardian takes a rather anti-Israeli position about which even its own reporters state that it is so anti-Israeli it (is) embarrassing , whereas the New York Times will probably be in favour of Ariel Sharon and Israel. After a short overview of the two newspapers, the topic will be introduced briefly. This will be followed by a linguistic analysis of a selection of articles which will focus on features with regard to the linguistic approach of critical linguistics and social semiotics of Roger Fowler (Fowler 1991). In the centre of attention will be the correlation of news language and its linguistic features within a social and ideological context. Finally, a conclusion will sum up and critically examine the results of the research done concerning the hypotheses of bias. 64 pp. Englisch

Neues Buch Abebooks.de
AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germany [51283250] [Rating: 5 (von 5)]
NEW BOOK Versandkosten: EUR 19.95
Details...
(*) Derzeit vergriffen bedeutet, dass dieser Titel momentan auf keiner der angeschlossenen Plattform verfügbar ist.
The Middle East Conflict in The Guardian and The New York Times - Demleitner, Patrizia
Vergriffenes Buch, derzeit bei uns nicht verfügbar.
(*)

Demleitner, Patrizia:

The Middle East Conflict in The Guardian and The New York Times - Taschenbuch

2007, ISBN: 9783638666060

[ED: Softcover], [PU: Grin Verlag], Seminar paper from the year 2002 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1.7, University of Regensburg (Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik), course: Hauptseminar The Language of News Reporting, 19 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Mark Twain once said, "If you don't read the newspaper, you are uninformed if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed". Indeed, it's true that most newspapers tend to be biased and to represent a certain ideology. Nearly imperceptible, the newsmaker leaves marks or hints of his attitude and ideology in his work and thus very often looses the independence and objectivity that news reporting ought to have. Evidence can be found for example in the choice of vocabulary, the sentence structure or the narrative structure of an article. This analysis wants to examine and compare two leading newspapers, the Guardian and the New York Times, with regard to bias in the way they are treating the Middle-East conflict. For a long time, the violence in the Middle East and the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians have been a common topic in the news and therefore it is important to know how far the reader can rely on an objective point of view when events are reported. Not a day goes by without a headline dealing with peacemaking efforts or a new attack of a suicide bomber or another advance of the Israeli army on Palestinian ground. I want to verify the hypotheses that the Guardian takes a rather anti-Israeli position about which even its own reporters state that it is "so anti-Israeli it (is) embarrassing" , whereas the New York Times will probably be in favour of Ariel Sharon and Israel. After a short overview of the two newspapers, the topic will be introduced briefly. This will be followed by a linguistic analysis of a selection of articles which will focus on features with regard to the linguistic approach of critical linguistics and social semiotics of Roger Fowler (Fowler 1991). In the centre of attention will be the correlation of news language and its linguistic features within a social and ideological context. Finally, a conclusion will sum up and critically examine the results of the research done concerning the hypotheses of bias.2007. 32 S. 210 mmVersandfertig in 3-5 Tagen, [SC: 0.00]

Neues Buch Booklooker.de
buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG
Versandkosten:Versandkostenfrei (EUR 0.00)
Details...
(*) Derzeit vergriffen bedeutet, dass dieser Titel momentan auf keiner der angeschlossenen Plattform verfügbar ist.
The Middle East Conflict in The Guardian and The New York Times - Demleitner, Patrizia
Vergriffenes Buch, derzeit bei uns nicht verfügbar.
(*)
Demleitner, Patrizia:
The Middle East Conflict in The Guardian and The New York Times - Taschenbuch

2007

ISBN: 9783638666060

[ED: Softcover], [PU: Grin Verlag], Seminar paper from the year 2002 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1.7, University of Regensburg (Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik), course: Hauptseminar The Language of News Reporting, 19 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Mark Twain once said, "If you don't read the newspaper, you are uninformed if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed". Indeed, it's true that most newspapers tend to be biased and to represent a certain ideology. Nearly imperceptible, the newsmaker leaves marks or hints of his attitude and ideology in his work and thus very often looses the independence and objectivity that news reporting ought to have. Evidence can be found for example in the choice of vocabulary, the sentence structure or the narrative structure of an article. This analysis wants to examine and compare two leading newspapers, the Guardian and the New York Times, with regard to bias in the way they are treating the Middle-East conflict. For a long time, the violence in the Middle East and the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians have been a common topic in the news and therefore it is important to know how far the reader can rely on an objective point of view when events are reported. Not a day goes by without a headline dealing with peacemaking efforts or a new attack of a suicide bomber or another advance of the Israeli army on Palestinian ground. I want to verify the hypotheses that the Guardian takes a rather anti-Israeli position about which even its own reporters state that it is "so anti-Israeli it (is) embarrassing" , whereas the New York Times will probably be in favour of Ariel Sharon and Israel. After a short overview of the two newspapers, the topic will be introduced briefly. This will be followed by a linguistic analysis of a selection of articles which will focus on features with regard to the linguistic approach of critical linguistics and social semiotics of Roger Fowler (Fowler 1991). In the centre of attention will be the correlation of news language and its linguistic features within a social and ideological context. Finally, a conclusion will sum up and critically examine the results of the research done concerning the hypotheses of bias.2007. 32 S. 210 mmVersandfertig in 3-5 Tagen

Neues Buch Booklooker.de
buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG
Versandkosten:zzgl. Versandkosten
Details...
(*) Derzeit vergriffen bedeutet, dass dieser Titel momentan auf keiner der angeschlossenen Plattform verfügbar ist.
The Middle East Conflict in The Guardian and The New York Times - Patrizia Demleitner
Vergriffenes Buch, derzeit bei uns nicht verfügbar.
(*)
Patrizia Demleitner:
The Middle East Conflict in The Guardian and The New York Times - neues Buch

2002, ISBN: 9783638666060

ID: 9f05f61e5218dd084c13fd8d47ee06cf

The Middle East Conflict in The Guardian and The New York Times Seminar paper from the year 2002 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1.7, University of Regensburg (Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik), course: Hauptseminar The Language of News Reporting, 19 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Mark Twain once said, "If you don't read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed". Indeed, it's true that most newspapers tend to be biased and to represent a certain ideology. Nearly imperceptible, the newsmaker leaves marks or hints of his attitude and ideology in his work and thus very often looses the independence and objectivity that news reporting ought to have. Evidence can be found for example in the choice of vocabulary, the sentence structure or the narrative structure of an article. This analysis wants to examine and compare two leading newspapers, the Guardian and the New York Times, with regard to bias in the way they are treating the Middle-East conflict. For a long time, the violence in the Middle East and the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians have been a common topic in the news and therefore it is important to know how far the reader can rely on an objective point of view when events are reported. Not a day goes by without a headline dealing with peacemaking efforts or a new attack of a suicide bomber or another advance of the Israeli army on Palestinian ground. I want to verify the hypotheses that the Guardian takes a rather anti-Israeli position about which even its own reporters state that it is "so anti-Israeli it (is) embarrassing" , whereas the New York Times will probably be in favour of Ariel Sharon and Israel. After a short overview of the two newspapers, the topic will be introduced briefly. This will be followed by a linguistic analysis of a selection of articles which will focus on features with regard to the linguistic approach of critica Bücher / Fremdsprachige Bücher / Englische Bücher 978-3-638-66606-0, GRIN

Neues Buch Buch.de
Nr. 14850401 Versandkosten:Bücher und alle Bestellungen die ein Buch enthalten sind versandkostenfrei, sonstige Bestellungen innerhalb Deutschland EUR 3,-, ab EUR 20,- kostenlos, Bürobedarf EUR 4,50, kostenlos ab EUR 45,-, Versandfertig in 5 - 7 Tagen, zzgl. Versandkosten
Details...
(*) Derzeit vergriffen bedeutet, dass dieser Titel momentan auf keiner der angeschlossenen Plattform verfügbar ist.
The Middle East Conflict in The Guardian and The New York Times - Patrizia Demleitner
Vergriffenes Buch, derzeit bei uns nicht verfügbar.
(*)
Patrizia Demleitner:
The Middle East Conflict in The Guardian and The New York Times - neues Buch

2002, ISBN: 9783638666060

ID: 153712002

Seminar paper from the year 2002 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1.7, University of Regensburg (Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik), course: Hauptseminar The Language of News Reporting, 19 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Mark Twain once said, ´´If you don´t read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed´´. Indeed, it´s true that most newspapers tend to be biased and to represent a certain ideology. Nearly imperceptible, the newsmaker leaves marks or hints of his attitude and ideology in his work and thus very often looses the independence and objectivity that news reporting ought to have. Evidence can be found for example in the choice of vocabulary, the sentence structure or the narrative structure of an article. This analysis wants to examine and compare two leading newspapers, the Guardian and the New York Times, with regard to bias in the way they are treating the Middle-East conflict. For a long time, the violence in the Middle East and the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians have been a common topic in the news and therefore it is important to know how far the reader can rely on an objective point of view when events are reported. Not a day goes by without a headline dealing with peacemaking efforts or a new attack of a suicide bomber or another advance of the Israeli army on Palestinian ground. I want to verify the hypotheses that the Guardian takes a rather anti-Israeli position about which even its own reporters state that it is ´´so anti-Israeli it (is) embarrassing´´ , whereas the New York Times will probably be in favour of Ariel Sharon and Israel. After a short overview of the two newspapers, the topic will be introduced briefly. This will be followed by a linguistic analysis of a selection of articles which will focus on features with regard to the linguistic approach of critica The Middle East Conflict in The Guardian and The New York Times Buch (fremdspr.) Bücher>Fremdsprachige Bücher>Englische Bücher, GRIN

Neues Buch Thalia.de
No. 14850401 Versandkosten:, Versandfertig in 2 - 3 Tagen, DE (EUR 0.00)
Details...
(*) Derzeit vergriffen bedeutet, dass dieser Titel momentan auf keiner der angeschlossenen Plattform verfügbar ist.

< zum Suchergebnis...
Details zum Buch
The Middle East Conflict in The Guardian and The New York Times
Autor:

Demleitner, Patrizia

Titel:

The Middle East Conflict in The Guardian and The New York Times

ISBN-Nummer:

9783638666060

Scholary Paper aus dem Jahr 2002 im Fachbereich Anglistik - Linguistik, einseitig bedruckt, Note: 1.7, Universität Regensburg (Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik), Veranstaltung: Hauptseminar The Language of News Reporting, 19 Eintragungen im Literaturverzeichnis, Sprache: Englisch, Abstract: Mark Twain once said, "If you don't read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed". Indeed, it's true that most newspapers tend to be biased and to represent a certain ideology. Nearly imperceptible, the newsmaker leaves marks or hints of his attitude and ideology in his work and thus very often looses the independence and objectivity that news reporting ought to have. Evidence can be found for example in the choice of vocabulary, the sentence structure or the narrative structure of an article. This analysis wants to examine and compare two leading newspapers, the Guardian and the New York Times, with regard to bias in the way they are treating the Middle-East conflict. For a long time, the violence in the Middle East and the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians have been a common topic in the news and therefore it is important to know how far the reader can rely on an objective point of view when events are reported. Not a day goes by without a headline dealing with peacemaking efforts or a new attack of a suicide bomber or another advance of the Israeli army on Palestinian ground. I want to verify the hypotheses that the Guardian takes a rather anti-Israeli position about which even its own reporters state that it is "so anti-Israeli it (is) embarrassing" , whereas the New York Times will probably be in favour of Ariel Sharon and Israel. After a short overview of the two newspapers, the topic will be introduced briefly. This will be followed by a linguistic analysis of a selection of articles which will focus on features with regard to the linguistic approach of critical linguistics and social semiotics of Roger Fowler (Fowler 1991). In the centre of attention will be the correlation of news language and its linguistic features within a social and ideological context. Finally, a conclusion will sum up and critically examine the results of the research done concerning the hypotheses of bias.

Detailangaben zum Buch - The Middle East Conflict in The Guardian and The New York Times


EAN (ISBN-13): 9783638666060
ISBN (ISBN-10): 3638666069
Taschenbuch
Erscheinungsjahr: 2007
Herausgeber: GRIN Verlag
64 Seiten
Sprache: eng/Englisch

Buch in der Datenbank seit 10.10.2007 15:46:51
Buch zuletzt gefunden am 27.10.2016 15:52:58
ISBN/EAN: 9783638666060

ISBN - alternative Schreibweisen:
3-638-66606-9, 978-3-638-66606-0

< zum Suchergebnis...
< zum Archiv...
Benachbarte Bücher